More than a billion people eat fewer than 1,900 calories per day. The majority of them work in agriculture, about 60 percent are women or girls, and most are in rural Africa and Asia. Ending their hunger is one of the few unimpeachably noble tasks left to humanity, and we live in a rare time when there is the knowledge and political will to do so. The question is, how? Conventional wisdom suggests that if people are hungry, there must be a shortage of food, and all we need do is figure out how to grow more.
This logic turns hunger into a symptom of a technological deficit, telling a story in which a little agricultural know-how can feed the world. It’s a seductive view, and one that appears to underwrite President Obama’s vision for ending hunger. In an interview with an African news agency, he shared his frustration over “the fact that the Green Revolution that we introduced into India in the ’60s, we haven’t yet introduced into Africa in 2009. In some countries, you’ve got declining agricultural productivity. That makes absolutely no sense.” In a squat beige Seattle office buildi
Related Articles
- Large scale land investments do not benefit local communities (energybulletin.net)
- Hunger in India: ‘The cause is lack of political will’ (guardian.co.uk)
- Chronic Hunger Estimated to Affect 925 M People (isaaa.org)
- Mozambique’s food riots – the true face of global warming | Raj Patel (guardian.co.uk)
- Eric Holt Gimenez: Food Sovereignty Chronicles (huffingtonpost.com)
- Can the World Meet Its Promise to Halve Hunger by 2015? (ecocentric.blogs.time.com)
- Eric Holt Gimenez: Monsanto in Gates’ Clothing? The Emperor’s New GMOs (huffingtonpost.com)